 |
|
Nov 26, 2006, 12:17 AM // 00:17
|
#1 |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: [FINE] Fat Insecure Neurotic Emotional
Profession: P/W
|
Updated Alliance System
This has probably been suggested before, and if it breaks some forum rule please do not hesitate to lock.
My idea (and probably many other's) is to give us access to the roster of all allied guilds. I want to be able to see who is on and who is not without having to consult my incomplete friends list or asking over the chat. I believe this would simplilfy many things about having alliances, and would make many people happy. I am in an alliance where some very good friends of mine are leaders of other guilds. I'd really like to be able to see what's going on whenever I want to. Just /sign or /notsigned and we will see if we can get this done. Last edited by Rurik Jangeer; Nov 26, 2006 at 12:18 AM // 00:18.. Reason: Spelling |
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 03:39 AM // 03:39
|
#2 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At my computer, playing Guild Wars, of course!
Guild: Lords of Myth [tom]
Profession: W/
|
/signed This issue makes me angry. I want to know if the cool people in other guilds are on! (I don't use friends lists; keep forgetting the hotkey
 )
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 09:19 AM // 09:19
|
#3 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jul 2006
Guild: [bleh]
Profession: Mo/
|
/signed
Not a bad idea at all =P |
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 05:41 PM // 17:41
|
#4 |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: The Ka-Tet of Gilead
Profession: Mo/W
|
lol yeah this has been said before...
HOWEVER: i dont have ANY problem whatsoever with typing "/signed" 8 BILLION times if thats what it takes for Anet to implement this. it wouldnt be hard AT ALL and personally i dont have a CLUE why they DONT have this. It would be great if you could click on a guild in the Alliance Roster menu and see a list of their players with "offline" or "online" next to their names... OK now i might be crazy lol but i seem to remember gaille saying theyd NEVER implement this. can someone confirm?? If so can we have SOMEONE give us a rational explanation as to WHY we will never have this... Thank-You |
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 05:47 PM // 17:47
|
#5 | |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: E/Mo
|
Quote:
1) I'm no expert in programming, but I think implementing an alliance roster would take up bandwith. Since Guild Wars doesn't have any monthly fees, they would want to keep it as cheap as possible. 2) There are some ***holes out there who ruin peoples' fun. If we had an alliance roster, a player would look it up and see if a certain player was online, if he was, the player might harass the other player in whispers. Despite those problems, it'd be cool to have the alliance roster. Nothing else annoys me more than seeing "Anyone online?" in the alliance chat. (except for elementalist-haters and people who think warrior is the most superior profession.) /signed |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 05:58 PM // 17:58
|
#6 |
|
Underworld Spelunker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo
Guild: Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]
Profession: E/
|
Hm... instead of complete lists, they could add a (x/y) after ach alliance name in the list.
No more 'anyone online?'. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 06:08 PM // 18:08
|
#7 | |
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Moe's Pub
Guild: Pigs Can Fly [Pigs]
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 06:32 PM // 18:32
|
#8 |
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: void
Profession: Mo/
|
/signed
though I think a (30 out of 50 people online) would be fine enough |
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 06:45 PM // 18:45
|
#9 |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Iowa
Profession: R/E
|
/signed It would be a very nice additive.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 07:31 PM // 19:31
|
#10 |
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Twisted Revenge [TR]
Profession: E/
|
/signed
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 09:05 PM // 21:05
|
#11 |
|
I'm the king
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Aussie Trolling Crew: Grand Phallus and Chairman Pro Tempore
|
I'd rather the remove the whole Kurzick/Luxon deal first, but /signed.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 10:41 PM // 22:41
|
#12 |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: The Ka-Tet of Gilead
Profession: Mo/W
|
lol why do you want them to remove the kurzick/luxon thing lol that was the WHOLE point of factions. without that, factions was...well more of nothing than it already is.
and on the whole bandwith thing, wouldnt it take even MORE to have everyone fill up their friends lists... |
|
|
|
|
Nov 26, 2006, 10:59 PM // 22:59
|
#13 |
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Profession: Me/
|
why not?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27, 2006, 12:50 AM // 00:50
|
#14 |
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Pole
Guild: The Magus Order
Profession: N/Mo
|
I think is might be simpler if they simply made it so that you can see all people that are online in your allied guilds. After all, you only really care about who's on don't you?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27, 2006, 06:05 AM // 06:05
|
#15 |
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: [FINE] Fat Insecure Neurotic Emotional
Profession: P/W
|
When Gaile was talking about the list being too long, if she was, I can't understand how this idea would have that problem....
It would be a screen IDENTICAL to your guild roster. You click on that guilds name, a box apprears, you click on a button such as "show roster". That guild's roster is your your "G" button. Exiting and re-entering the "G" screen resets it. HOW would that harass the bandwidth? HOW?? You are getting rid of your screen for a new one, HOW HOW HOW? |
|
|
|
 |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM // 11:00.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("